Alisa M. Libby

My name is Alisa and I am the communications assistant here at the Simmons Graduate School for Library and Information Science.

I have a B.F.A in writing, literature and publishing from Emerson College and love to write!

My first novel, The Blood Confession, was published by Dutton Books in 2006. My second, The King’s Rose, will be published on March 19, 2009. I am incredibly excited for the book’s release, and suffering a curious combination of joy, anxiety, and blinding terror.

I’ve always had the innate desire and determination to write, if not always the discipline. As a teenager I read Edgar Allan Poe and wrote stories about madness and obsession. I wrote a lot of very terrible poetry, and maybe one or two decent ones. This hasn’t changed much: I write a lot of dross before I come up with something that sounds any good.

Each book I write has a particular soundtrack that I listen to constantly while writing. For The Blood Confession it was a combination of Bjork’s greatest hits, the soundtrack to Bram Stoker’s Dracula, and Mozart’s Requiem Mass. That book also had a theme song: The Rolling Stones’ "Sympathy for the Devil." While writing The King’s Rose I listened to the soundtrack for the BBC miniseries The Virgin Queen, and beautiful Tudor-era music composed by King Henry VIII.

One experience that made a great impact on me was the semester I spent studying abroad during my sophomore year of college. I lived in a castle in Holland and spent long weekends traveling around to different countries in Europe. I was completely submerged in this new way of life; the little town where we spent our week, the overnight train rides each weekend, the hours spent wandering museums and unfamiliar streets, and even the bizarre techno night clubs. I felt like Alice tumbling down the rabbit hole: everything was worth exploring, pondering, and writing down—even the smallest detail. Unfortunately it has proved impossible to sustain that kind of amazement during my normal life (a ride on the green line is a ride on the green line) but I try to always be on the lookout for inspiration.

Recently posted by Alisa Libby

Thank you for the reconnecting...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
As a new group of bloggers will be introduced this fall, this is my official farewell to Simmons Reconnect. Thank you for all of your comments on my blog posts - it's been a wonderful opportunity to share with you all!

If you are interested in hearing more news about The King's Rose, The Blood Confession, and whatever my third book (still in progress) may turn out to be, please visit my blog at www.alisamlibby.wordpress.com. You can also visit my website for more information about my novels: www.alisalibby.com.

Many thanks,
Alisa

What better inspiration for a writer than spending three full days talking about books with book-minded people? Not only that, the fare was children's literature: picture book, middle grade, young adult, graphic novel, fiction, non-fiction, poetry. Here are a few of my personal highlights from the Institute:

I thanked Jack Gantos for the nice response he sent to my whiny email about writer's block. I read Jack on the Tracks last year and it renewed my faith in books and writing. And it was hilarious, as is Mr. Gantos. He also told us a story about a fantastically horrible Rotten Ralph costume that I think he should bring to the next Institute.

After being treated to a bit of Joni Mitchell by Martha Brooks (who sings in a jazz band) and wacky, murderous folk songs by JonArno Lawson, I decided that I need another talent to spice up my book talks. I chatted with JonArno about this. He suggested maracas.

Kristin Cashore did a lovely job of connecting the origins of Graceling to the Institute's theme of Crimes & Misdemeanors, but in a way that was unexpected and more personal. Blue Balliett shared photos of the art, locations, and severely messy desks that inspired the creation of Chasing Vermeer and her more recent novels. Her talk made me want to visit a town and take notes and imagine scenes of my characters scrambling around, getting mud on their sneakers and ice cream on their shirts.

Many more authors spoke, all of them severely wonderful (Marilyn Nelson has the most beautiful reading voice, and M.T. Anderson is simply stunningly brilliant) and I can't possibly write about all of them. There were also some sprightly discussions during breakout sessions on the topics of censorship, book reviews, and a seriously impassioned discussion about "bad boys" in literature and how they have changed (and not changed) since Byron.

If anyone reading this is interested in children's literature, please check out the program at Simmons - or at least check back in two years about the next Institute. Part of the fun of attending is meeting librarians, teachers, authors, editors, and reviewers - everyone with a love for this literature. That said, I'll leave you with the question that Anita Silvey poses in her new book, Everything I Need to Know I Learned from a Children's Book: what children's book changed the way you see the world? For my answer and more about my books and writing, visit my blog: alisamlibby.wordpress.com.

myths about Catherine Howard; lots of books, too

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

I was invited to do a guest post at The Anne Boleyn Files, which is an awesome blog that debunks all kinds of myths and heresies surrounding King Henry's second queen - a must for any Tudor history buff, or fan of The Tudors. My post attempts to debunk some rumors about Catherine Howard. There are so many rumors that it was difficult to choose just a few, but I focused on the big ones: Catherine was stupid, greedy, slutty...you get the picture. Read the full post here:

http://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/catherine-howard-by-alisa-m-libby/1616/

Claire, queen of the site, also wrote a wonderful review of The King's Rose. Hooray!:

http://reviews.theanneboleynfiles.com/the-kings-rose-by-alisa-m-libby/118

I've been doing a lot of reading myself lately, in preparation for the Children's Literature Institute this weekend at Simmons College. Here are some of the books I've read, written by authors who will be speaking at the conference. I'll be posting a post-conference report early next week.

Feed_cover image

cover_olives_oceanA Wreath for Emmett Till_coverGraceling Cover jpegShooter_cover

The Devil's Storybook_coverchasing vermeer_cover

MOMA

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

At the Museum of Modern Art this past weekend I was thinking about the nature of art. I thought about this a lot as a kid. Dad was an artist so we had art in our house but how was that different from art in museums? Why was the canvas with the single polka dot on it hanging on the wall of a museum and the miniature violins I watched Dad make were not? I was (and still am) biased, of course.

But I did find the Jackson Pollack paintings more striking and moving than I had imagined I would. One of them reminded me of beautiful Japanese calligraphy in bold black strokes on a parchment background.

jackson pollock_close up1

Another painting was heavily layered with paint, in addition to cigarette butts and bits of other stuff. It was described as a "labyrinth," which fascinates me - I like the idea of a maze of paths connecting and criss-crossing and dead-ending without any rhyme or reason. I could get lost in a maze (or a painting) like that.

Jackson Pollock_close up2

back from NYC weekend

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Tom and I wrapped up some ginger snaps in a kerchief, tied it to the end of a stick and ran away for the weekend. We ran all the way to New York City and spent some time dining and museuming and in general catching up with the adorable Amanda and David. They even took us to the top of Rockefeller Center where we watched the sun set all pink orange blue over the twinkly city.

We came home yesterday just in time to get to my reading at the Kingston Public Library, which I'm happy to say was really lovely - my first outdoor reading, held in the library courtyard. I only hope that all the hours on the bus didn't make me too loopy.

I'll blog more about NYC and our visit to the MOMA, but for now I'll leave you with links to two gorgeous book review blogs. Many thanks to Alaine and Melissa for their beautiful, thoughtful reviews of The King's Rose:

http://alainereading.blogspot.com/2009/07/kings-rose-by-alisa-m-libby.html
http://www.melissas-bookshelf.com/2009/07/review-kings-rose.html

library book talk and ARCs for review...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

I will be doing a book talk at the Kingston Public Library next Monday, July 13 at 6 p.m. I plan to read an excerpt from The King's Rose, then talk a bit about my writing process and how I came to be published. I'm looking forward to it - I just hope I have an audience (hint, hint).

The book tour has gradually wound down - though I'm still visiting blogs! I love guest-blogging. My current task is to write a blog entry debunking some common misconceptions about Catherine, for example: that she was notoriously dim-witted. Perhaps I'm too close to my subject matter, but I have some actual historical texts to back up my admittedly sympathetic argument. Speaking of blogs...if anyone reading this maintains a book review blog and you're interested in reviewing The King's Rose, contact me. I may have an ARC for you, if you're interested.

[Pause: I just watched Roxanne get stuck under her dog blanket. I don't know how she managed this. I tried to get a photo - mean! I know - but she escaped in time to save her precious dignity.]

I've been floating around between projects as of late, distracting myself with reading copious books and baking copious cookies (oh, and polynesian-style meatballs). There are worse things to do while not writing. I've been taking note of things in what I hope is a writerly way: the glossy amber slugs scattered in couplets across the wet sidewalk, the train window silvered with raindrops...(yes, it's still raining). But I know I have to get back to it, for real. Even though this new project isn't clicking just yet, I think it deserves a little more effort. And Tom has requested that I calm down on the cookie baking, for the sake of our collective health.

Before I turn to my fussily highlighted outline, let me introduce you to the Queen Elizabeth:

 Queen Elizabeth in a vase

how to love the rain

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

It's been a soggy summer. New Englanders are a people naturally inclined to complain about the weather, but I think we would all like to complain about something different for a change; preferably while wearing a tank top and eating an ice cream cone. But as we looking ahead to more rainy days, here are some suggestions.

1. Pretend you are in Scotland. I've been doing this all day and it's helped a great deal. It rains a lot in Scotland - Inverness was flooded when Tom and I visited - but the rain is beautiful there, everything veiled in gray mist. And the grass is so green you just want to roll around on it. So yes, imagine that you are in Scotland, gazing at a castle in the distance. (In my case, the cupola on top of the Simmons Main College Building will do in a pinch.)

2. Drink tea. With lots of honey. And cookies. While you're at it, bake some cookies. This has been my thing lately. It distracts me (briefly) from book worries.

3. Read. Here I may be able to help you out: I received some ARCs of The King's Rose in the mail yesterday, mailed to me by my editor's wonderful assistant. So if you happen to maintain a book review blog, I just might send you an ARC so you can do something while stuck inside. Comment with your name, email and blog url and I'll get in touch with you.

4. Be glad there isn't a drought and a heat wave, frying our lawns to a dry brown and making me wholly irritable. Speaking of which, in spite of the rain, the Mr. Lincoln's in front of our house were the first to bloom. They even beat out the Queen Elizabeth's, which had been my bet for first bloomers:

Mr. Lincoln blooms

And here, a puppy blooms among the roses:

puppy rose

Characters, all of you, everywhere

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Truth is stranger than fiction. I know this for a fact, because I ride the subway every day. While I delight in the crazy characters imagined by the great brains of Jack Gantos or Daniel Pinkwater I often wonder, how do they come up with this stuff? But then I look up from my book only to be astounded by the interesting details being played out on the human stage. Some of my recent favorites? That guy in the coffee shop with the beautifully worn old brown leather journal, the ivory pages covered in the most spidery gorgeous (not to mention illegible) handwriting in black ink; a perfect match to his worn copy of Kierkegard. Then there is the old guy with the steel grey bouffant hairdo and pencil mustache that I see sometimes on the green line - I do not exaggerate here, because this man requires none. There are also gold chains involved and (though I may be thinking of someone else on the green line now) a busty mermaid tattooed on his hairy man arm. Vivid, yes? Or the young woman on the train wearing a worn, long white dress - shades of Miss Havisham.

That said, I know all too well that these superficial details do not a character make. I read an interview with author Mort Castle (whose books I have yet to read, I admit). I got the opportunity to submit a question, so I asked what he thought was integral to good horror fiction (though this could work for any fiction). I love his answer: "Human beings for whom we give a damn." Well said. The details themselves - the philosophy, the journal, the tattoos, the gown - these are enticing, but there needs to be something beneath that. Something real.

And now...more blog reviews! I can't tell you how it thrills me to read these:
http://juiciliciousssreviews.blogspot.com/2009/06/kings-rose-review.html
http://bookworminginthe21stcentury.blogspot.com/2009/06/kings-rose.html

Celebrate the YA Book Carnival with this CONTEST to win a signed copy of The King's Rose!
http://shootingstarsmag.blogspot.com/2009/06/ya-carnival-contest-kings-rose.html

Long live the King...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

On June 24th 1509 - 500 years ago - King Henry VIII was officially crowned King of England in a glorious coronation ceremony, alongside his new bride, Catherine of Aragon. Not that the crown did her much good years later, but that's a different story.

Do I feel odd "celebrating" this day in history, considering my obvious sympathies for Catherine Howard and how Henry was really quite integral to the girl's downfall? Not really...though I remember experiencing a strange moment of pause in the gift shop of The Tower of London (an odd concept right there, if you think about it) over a teddy bear dressed like King Henry. As far as I know Catherine's ghost did not follow me and teddy henry home to haunt me for the purchase.

But was Henry was a tyrant? He certainly had plenty of tyrant-like qualities, especially in the latter (and infamous) part of his reign. He had a knack for changing the law to suit his current whims. Perhaps he confused what was best for England with what was simply best for himself (though I don't trust his judgment in his personal life, either). But what about earlier in his reign? To think of Henry as an enormous, scowling king gnawing on a turkey drumstick shows only one dimension of a very complicated creature, not to mention a reign that lasted nearly 40 years. Being king was, I think, a lonely business. Henry was surrounded by ambitious courtiers who had their own - not the King's, not England's - best interests at heart. Who was there to look out for him, or to try to tell him the truth in the midst of his mania?

In honor of the anniversary of the coronation, I choose not to think of the aging, unwieldy king that Henry became later in life, putting aside his devoted wife of many years in his single-minded quest for an heir. Instead I choose to think of the Golden Prince he was on this day, 500 years ago, with his beautiful queen at his side. When the royal crowns were set upon their heads, I'm sure they looked like England's future, and the future looked very fresh and bright, indeed.

writer's retreat

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

There are some really fancy writers retreats out there, where (for a fee) you can take a little vacation at a nice place where all you have to do is write, and all your meals are brought to you. Sort of like camp...but the goal is to get a lot of writing done. For a more low-cost twist, my friends Anne and Anna and I had a writer's retreat, hosted by Anna at her house. This was my first retreat - a one-day affair. I brought molasses cinnamon cookies, which I had baked the day before instead of writing (insert: use of irony).

writing with cookies

We each brought some ideas for writing prompts, only to find that we really weren't in the mood for writing prompts. Instead we talked about our projects and what we're struggling with at the moment, which I found very helpful. Then we ate pizza, which was also very helpful (fuel is important if you want to get any work done).

pizza

Then we actually sat and did some writing, in companiable quiet. I was worried that I wouldn't be able to concentrate with friends in the room, but I was pleased with the outcome of the day: not just the pages I produced, but with the collegial feeling of the whole experiment. Writing is a lonely business; it was nice to take it out of my office for a change, and hang out in the company of other writers, all of us doing our thing. And it's fun to think of all the various ideas floating around this table: ghosts, fanatic obsession, baby donkeys...

happy writing

And every writer's retreat needs a mascot. Our mascot was the baby bunny that lives near Anna's house and eats her sunflower buds.

bunny3

no, I don't drink blood, or bathe in it, really...

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Someone commented recently about the irony of my inherent shyness (which I have mentioned on this blog) considering I chose the point of view of a shameless, knife-wielding murderer for my first book. It begs the question: why do we, as writers, write what we do? What is it that draws us to tell the stories of particular characters, regardless of how (un)pleasant these people may be? As I'm sure I've said before, Erzebet was fascinating to write about - but I wouldn't want to have tea with her. She would probably stab me over the scones.

I was drawn to write about Erzebet because she is in so many ways my stark opposite: so fixated on her own appearance that she'll have no remorse about bleeding her helpless servant girls in order to harvest their blood for her own beauty regimen. She is callous, high-handed, and a perfectionist when it comes to creating the face reflected back at her in the mirror. She craves the power that beauty gives her and even revels in the pure violence as she wreaks her blood-thirsty havoc on the girls unfortunate enough to find themselves in her employ.

I'm not saying that I'm completely without vanity, but I can't even bother with makeup, never mind opening the veins of a servant every night. But aside from these over-arching issues, there were certainly ways that Erzebet and I could connect: her vanity stretched all the way to insecurity, as vanity often does. Her fears of the future, of change, and of the unknown leads her to some very dark places in her own soul, and while she takes a very different route to combat those dark places (with blade in hand) I know I've experienced those same fears, too. So the key to writing about her was finding a way to empathize with her, in spite of her monstrous past-times.

Empathy aside, it's simply fun to write about someone completely different, completely alien to yourself. At the risk of frightening any psychologists who may be reading, there is something deliciously terrifying about experiencing - from a safe distance - Erzebet's glee at the havoc she unleashed, both within her own heart and created in her personal hell on earth in that dark tower dungeon. She is completely out of control, but also completely in control of her own actions, her own mad spiral, and I could just hear her laughing giddily the whole way down. Until, of course, the very end.

Writers out there (and I know you're out there) please chime in! And no, I'm not referring only to published writers - if you write, then you're a writer. Do you choose characters who are like you, in obvious or in secret ways?

an ode to poetry

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

A real live teenage girl reviewed The King's Rose for the SLJ Teen supplement - ACES!

http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6662385.html?nid=4302&source=link&rid=1640648756

In further awesomeness, my beautiful friend Lesley's book of poetry is now on Amazon.com and available for purchase:

http://www.amazon.com/Ghost-Fashion-Lesley-Jenike/dp/1934999571/ref=sr_1_1ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1243363170&sr=8-1

I have yet to read this collection, but her last one was full of marvelously detailed poetry drawing on images from musical theatre. To my mind, poetry is hard, people. Every single word counts when you write a poem, every line break, every image. It's not easy stuff and there aren't a lot of poets who get a great deal of attention. So let's say cheers in honor of our poet friends for the wonderful work that they do. (You have poet friends too, right? We should all have at least one poet close by, in case of emergency.) Perhaps as an ode to poetry I will share with all of you an excerpt from that vampire epic I wrote as a teenager. Or, perhaps in an even better ode to poetry, I will post no such thing.

romanticizing writing

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

When I'm in a phase like this where I'm not writing (it's valuable to have time away from a project to get a fresh perspective) it's all to easy for me to romanticize the whole process of writing. My friend Lauren, whose debut novel Nothing Like You will be out this October, is working on a draft of a new project. I keep hounding her with emails: "how is it going? What part are you working on? Tell me about it!" I'm about one crazed email away from asking her what she's eating while writing.

Writing does seem romantic - especially when you're not doing it. I'm able to focus only on the good parts of the process, the inspiration and that wonderful sound of the click click of the keyboard and the satisfying fun of digging deep into a character and trying something new. I can conveniently ignore how dreadful it feels when things aren't going well, and I'm squirming in my seat and all I want to do is leave my desk and eat a whole lot of candy, but I have to force myself to stay put. And sometimes that works and other times I just sit there and eat candy and feel even more miserable. But that's all part of the process too, nothing terribly unusual.

I was reading The Trouble with Poetry by Billy Collins (side note: I came home one day from work to find this very book sitting on Tom's leather chair with my teddy bear and I laughed out loud):

trouble with poetry

In so many of his poems Collins talks about the act of writing poetry, interspersed with the mundanities of a regular day: the breakfast he ate, the knick knacks on the kitchen shelf. The poem takes place in this domestic scene, and we're invited into it: not only into the poem, but into the creation of the poem. The fact that I'm completely pining for writing at the moment made me enjoy the poems even more. There is also the novel The Thirteenth Tale by Diane Setterfield, which includes such a beautiful description of the main character sitting down to write that it made me want to hug the book. I identified so strongly with that wonderful feeling of a perfect writing day, and it made me so happy to be a writer - squirming and candy-eating aside.

as promised - the Historical Novel Review

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
THE KING'S ROSE
Alisa M. Libby, Dutton, 2009, $17.99, hb, 304pp, 9780525479703

As The King's Rose opens, fifteen-year-old Catherine Howard has a new suitor--Henry VIII, who soon plans to make her his queen. It is a role Catherine's fiercely ambitious Howard relations have been grooming her to fill, her dubious past notwithstanding. Dutifully, Catherine follows their lead, despite her own misgivings and the haunting example of her doomed, glamorous cousin, Anne Boleyn.

In this novel, narrated by Catherine, Libby takes on several challenges, and succeeds admirably in all of them. First, she tells the story in the first-person present tense, a device which, in the hands of the wrong writer, can quickly become tedious or unintentionally comical. Here, however, it works, helping to build an atmosphere of tension and growing menace. Second, Libby presents the more salacious aspects of Catherine's story to young adult readers in a manner that is neither prurient nor unrealistic. Third, Libby tells an oft-told story in a way that makes it seem fresh to those who have heard it often; at the same time, she gives enough background detail so that those who are less familiar with Henry VIII's wives will not be at a loss. Finally, her Catherine is a sympathetic figure, yet Libby gives her a certain amount of edge and does not fall into the easy trap of making her wholly the victim of her scheming elders. As a result, this is a novel that will be staying on my crowded Tudor shelf. Ages 14 and up. Susan Higginbotham

let's all give Anne Boleyn her due...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Today, May 19, is the anniversary of Anne Boleyn's execution. According to what the Guard at the Chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula told us, there will be a dozen red roses gracing Anne's burial place today. And more besides, I imagine...I wonder what she would think about her story being currently so popular in the modern consciousness? I'm pretty sure she would love it.

Last night I read from The King's Rose at a "New England Voices" reading arranged by the Foundation for Children's Books. It was a wonderful event and I purchased books from my fellow readers: Giles LaRoche, Grace Lin and Julie Berry. I've met Julie before and she is not only a talented writer but also a sweet, warm, delightful human being. I read third right after Giles LaRoche; it's not ideal to have to follow a man who creates a sillouette of a pagoda in front of our eyes with a piece of construction paper and a pair of scissors, but I perservered. I was very nervous but the audience was receptive so I hope it went well. I also heard a lot about authors doing school visits...I wonder if I would ever do a school visit. What in the world would I talk about? It's worth considering.

In other excitement, I received word about a review for The King's Rose that will be published in the May issue of Historical Novels Review. This review made me simultaneously clap and smile, then wave my arms around like a helicopter. I'll see if I can post it here on my blog.

In reading news, I finished the wonderful novel, The Red Queen's Daughter this morning. However, I didn't have another book with me as back up, so I had (had to!) go to the Simmons College Library and take out a book. Which means I took out three: Feed by M.T. Anderson, The Wolves of Willoughby Chase by Joan Aiken, and Tolkein's The Hobbit (which is already on my reading list). At home I have Skellig and two Francesca Lia Block books from the local library. I'm also considering adding Margaret George's Memoirs of Cleopatra to my reading list, because the only thing that would interrupt me from reading all 900-some-odd pages of it would be if I heard back from my literary agent about the latest revision...so perhaps if I start reading it will be like tempting fate. Perfectly logical, yes?

fretting about new work-in-progress

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

The Spring semester has drawn to a close with yesterday's glorious Commencement Day. I'm so happy for all of the graduates. I should be gleefully indulging in all things summer-ish and lovely, as I hope you are. And you probably don't want to read about someone fretting.

But that's what I've been doing, I'll admit it: I've been fretting about my new work-in-progress.

This may be depressing for the writers out there to hear, but insecurities about your writing do not vanish the moment you've signed your first publishing contract. At least they didn't for me. I had a prolonged bout with writer's block when I was trying to find out what I would write after The King's Rose. This current project was the thing that pulled me out of it. I put every image or idea that inspired me as a kid (and still does, even now) on the page and tried to write the story I would have wanted to read at age 13... And now I'm really hoping that it will work, that it will actually become a book.

But what if it doesn't? Does that make the writing of it any less important? Isn't the craft of writing itself worthwhile, even without a contract? Of course it is - yes, of course it is! But I suppose I've become addicted to the validation of publication. Never mind that, but just the ability to get my work out there and for people to READ it. That's the fun (though scary, too, at times) of getting published.

However, fretting will get me nowhere. I have tea to drink and grapes to eat and books to read, to distract me from my worries. I loved The Hunger Games, and now I'm reading The Red Queen's Daughter by Jacqueline Kolosov (a late addition to my reading list) which I'm really enjoying. Elements of the story call to mind Wise Child by Monica Furlong - the story of a neglected girl taken in by a witch and taught all of her wonderful witchy ways - which was so beautifully written.

I'll keep you posted on the reading list...and the writing, once I get back to it.

I'll be at the Hudson Public Library tomorrow at 2 p.m., talking about the book and about writing and publishing in general. I'm hoping I'll get some Tudor fanatics and/or some writers with questions about the whole process. I love talking to writers about my adventures in book-writing. I try to think of what I wanted to hear before I was published, what would have helped inspire me to stick with it.

In the meantime, I've been doing a lot of reading. I've said goodbye to the lovely Katsa (of Graceling) and now I've already fallen for Katniss (of The Hunger Games). I also received an embarrassment of riches thanks to Interlibrary loan: I had three books (including The Red Queen's Daughter which was NOT on my posted reading list) and the final season of Deadwood waiting for us. We haven't finished watching season 4 of Buffy the Vampire Slayer yet (oh yes, I am a BIG Buffy fan) but we're more than halfway through. I'm enjoying it even more the second time around!

Back to books: I'm actually kind of a slow reader. If the book is really well-written then I'll go back and reread passages over and over again. Most recently I did this with Laura Amy Schlitz's A Drowned Maiden's Hair - her descriptions of Maud enjoying her first carousel ride were just so utterly vivid and beautiful. I really dwell in a book as I read it, I can't tear through them. This is troubling at times since there are so many books out there to read...but I love language so much that I can't help but dwell on it.

In the meantime, I'm having moments of feeling a little itchy, wanting to get back to writing. I've been scribbling in my "insufferable little notebook" (Tom's affectionate term for the latest in my endless array of notebooks) at odd moments during the day, or during my commute. Sometimes I put it on my bedside table and I have to sit up late at night and scribble something down. Goodness knows what all of this scribbling will come to. I will keep you posted.

dinner with Andrei Codrescu

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

I get nervous around authors. Yes, I realize the irony implicit in this statement; I love it when people talk to me about my books and I can only assume that other authors feel the same way. But I still find it nerve-wracking to be on the other side of the signing table, as it were. I don't want to come across as needy or weird or moronic or any number of other bad things. And my fears increase in proportion to just how much I loved the author's book.

Case in point: last night I went to the BPL to hear Andrei Codrescu talk about his new book, The Posthuman Dada Guide: Tzara and Lenin Play Chess. I haven't read the new book (which sounds interesting, because of/in spite of the fact that I know near to nothing about the Dada movement) but I read Codrescu's novel The Blood Countess, about the one and only Countess Bathory - a creature close to my own heart as well, for all of her bloody malevolence. So after the reading I hung around for a bit, with a whole bunch of other people who wanted to approach him and say hello and talk to him and were too shy to do so. So I wasn't the only shy one. What makes it funnier is that Codrescu couldn't have been more friendly, more funny, more willing to chat with everyone...but that doesn't erase the possibility of my own embarrassment.

So I dawdled, but finally when I saw that he and his entourage were gathering themselves to go (the man wanted his fish & chips) I walked over and said hello and told him about my book and agreed to send him a copy (let's dwell on this for a moment: sending a copy of your own book to an author you admire who has also researched and written about this particular character...yeah, I'm just trying not to think about it too much.) Before I knew it, Mr. Codrescu was inviting me to join them for the aforementioned fish & chips. At first I said I couldn't, but then I thought, good grief girlie, how often does this happen that this totally cool and fellow Bathory-inspired author invites you to join him and his crew out for dinner? So I joined them.

Mind you, I am a shy person by nature. I feel like I'm just barely bold enough to get myself into these pretty amazing situations but not quite secure enough to be chatty and charming like a normal person would be. But it was still pretty awesome. Codrescu has written about Bathory so beautifully - even writing about her horrid atrocities so beautifully, and I love it when a writer can take the horrid and make it gothically gorgeous. We chatted about Bathory, about research, a lot about New Orleans, and bit about young adult literature. He informed me that writing about Bathory for a teenage audience is really quite scary - corrupting the minds of youth and all of that. And I agree.

reading lust...no, I mean "list," reading list

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

There is a certain pattern to my writing life: put simply, there are times when I'm writing, and times when I'm not writing. Sometimes the not-writing comes in the form of the demon writer's block that perches upon me like some hideous gargoyle. But other times, like right now, it's because I'm taking a little break from my current work-in-progress and reading as much as I possibly can. So here is my current reading list:

The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins
Graceling, Kristin Cashore
The Hobbit, J.R.R. Tolkien
The Phantom Tollbooth, Norton Juster
Rose Daughter, Robin McKinley
Skellig, David Almond

It's an eclectic list, including some titles I feel really guilty for not having read (you're all familiar with my book-related guilt by now, I'm sure). If there are others you feel I should move to the top of my list, please let me know. Now that I've actually written this list on my blog, I had better deliver and actually READ these books! I have a tendency to get distracted with other titles, like the pile of books I've purchased for my own collection and still have yet to read...Here's hoping I manage to tackle at least a few on this list. I'll keep you posted.

Back from NE SCBWI Conference!

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

No doubt you've noticed me fretting about presenting at the New England Society for Children's Writers & Illustrators Conference. Well, I'm happy to say "mission accomplished"! I'm home and recuperating from a wonderful weekend of "schmoozing and musing."

This was my first presentation and I had 80 people signed up for it, so I knew I needed to swallow all of my nerves and deliver the goods. My talk was "Writing Historical Fiction for Young Adults" and I had a lot to cover and only one hour to talk. One hour can go by quickly when you have a lot to say and you want time for Q&A. Still, I'm not a natural public speaker, so here are some tricks that I employed to help me out:

* I wore my red boots, as they tend to boost my confidence.
* I looked for a few friendly, engaged faces in the crowd (not necessarily faces of people I knew) and basically gave my presentation to them. There was one lovely woman whom I would have thanked if only I could find her later in the conference - she was so alert and engaged that I basically gave my entire presentation to her. It was so comforting.
* I did my best to pretend that I wasn't nervous. Maybe if I could fool the crowd then I could fool myself, too.
* I tried not to let things distract me. I had a few close moments. They had just broken down the tables for our lunch, and I guess the hotel staff were in the room right behind me playing with silverware, because I was distracted in the beginning by the sound of colliding forks. Then I had this surreal moment of "Lordy! Nancy Werlin is in the audience for my presentation!" Nancy is an amazing writer and speaker and a wonderful, sweet person. It was so great to see her in the audience, though it did give me a split second of panic.

I also learned that it's good to just sort of roll with things and find the humor. The room I had was very nice and set up perfectly with audience-style chairs. But there was no podium and no microphone. Luckily my audience was so nice that they helped me set my laptop up on a chair ("oops, the cord won't reach, lets move it to this chair"). I suppose it didn't hurt that I had brought candy for everyone. Then I just did my best to project my voice to the back row - not an easy task for me. I think my favorite surreal moment was realizing that people were TAKING NOTES from what I was saying. Huzzah!

In the end, I have no idea how I actually did - it's impossible to have perspective on your own presentation. But I didn't pass out, which was a plus. The low moment was when I said that Henry only had two children (who lived past infancy) - I was quickly reminded that no, he had three. Blurgh. It's sort of like getting your own name wrong in front of a crowd of people, but these things happen.

A lot of people told me they liked the presentation a lot and that I helped them make the process of researching and writing a historical novel seem less daunting - this was exactly my goal. So here's hoping people enjoyed it. I was happy to get the experience; I have to assume that they get easier from here on in. But next time I'll still wear my red boots. Why mess with what works?